Trump neatly glosses over the fact that he committed a federal crime when he stole the documents in the first place. And he makes his usual threat/request for more violence from hisUntil tonight, Trump statements were attacking reporters for relying on what his team said were false, politically motivated and anonymous statements related to his classified records at Mar-a-Lago. Now that archives is on the record saying it, the statement has changed a bit. pic.twitter.com/lOuNRMuxwV
— Josh Dawsey (@jdawsey1) February 19, 2022
So . . . Will Trump face any consequences for this latest crime?"The fake news is making it seem like me...was working in a filing room."
— Jennifer B Dot (@jenniferbdot) February 19, 2022
This is one statement he probably did write.
Almost certainly, no.
As Seth Abramson points out below, Trump was not in the White House for even four months before he gave classified information to the Russians during an Oval Office meeting, which strengthened hard-to-ignore rumors that Trump is a Russian agent. And nothing happened.
For those who think Trump will face some punishment for removing classified intel from the White House and taking it home to Florida, remember that his whole presidency was a national security scandal and *began* with him revealing Israeli intel to the Kremlin in the Oval Office
— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) February 19, 2022
For those who think Trump will face some punishment for removing classified intel from the White House and taking it home to Florida, remember that his whole presidency was a national security scandal and *began* with him revealing Israeli intel to the Kremlin in the Oval Office
My point is, I want to get excited about the breaking news today but unfortunately I wrote three books about Trump's national security violations and learned that not only does no one care when a POTUS is a national security threat but basically everyone agrees it must be ignored
And of course now Trump is an *ex*-POTUS, so you think that he can no longer be a virulent national security threat on a daily basis without consequences—until you realize that holding him accountable would embarrass a large number of powerful people so we'll just have to skip it
It's vital that journalists catalog every crime Trump committed so if there's an America 1,000 years from now he will *still* be considered the worst president and biggest traitor in our history, but that is separate from thinking 15 boxes of classified intel will bring him down
The upper limit of where today's breaking news goes is Trump is prosecuted in a case that takes 3 or 4 years and sees everyone associated with it threatened with death by MAGA terrorists on a daily basis, with the only result being that Trump gets 2 years of probation and a fine
That could change slightly if we find that he had input into which classified intelligence he would spirit out of the White House, and deliberately stole evidence he thought could be used to convict him, but even then the evidence would matter infinitely more than the theft of it
Remember, this is a man who was a focus of an 800-page DOJ report confirming unambiguously that he committed the federal felony of Obstruction of Justice at least a dozen times, and not only was he not prosecuted but DOJ is letting the statute of limitations lapse without comment
There are people in this country, in politics and law enforcement, whose *oaths* actually *compel* them to *ensure* that Trump is treated no differently than any other citizen—and all of America has watched them do f*ck-all since 2016 and that won't change because of today's news
This news will only matter if it can be linked to a broader criminal conspiracy to overthrow the federal government—which, to be clear, it is *entirely possible* that it ultimately will be
But that is *not* where we are tonight and that is *not* what the current breaking news is
Anyone on Twitter not being *very* clear that this is the 1000th national security scandal involving Trump—and I'm not exaggerating by much, because there really was one every few days for four years—and that none of them resulted in anything but news cycles is being disingenuous
The best part for me personally is that I can write a thread like this and still be confident that MAGA radicals will swear my response to today's news was "he promised Trump would go to prison 🤣"
What I actually say matters as little to these people as what Trump actually does
And if you wonder what prompts me to write a bitter thread like this, read any one of the Proof books—or all three—and imagine how angry I am being a lawyer who has watched hundreds of my fellow "brothers and sisters at the bar" violate their oaths with respect to Trump for years
This is not *exactly* right.
— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) February 18, 2022
The court ordered Trump to *sit for a deposition*.
Trump can plead the Fifth—and likely will—to many questions, avoiding answering them.
His son Eric—who like his father is a criminal—did so *500+ times* in a deposition in the same case last year. https://t.co/cJfrS6sanj
PS2/ In any case, we must distinguish between the reporting that says Trump "must answer questions" (false), the reporting that says Trump "must testify" (technically true but misleading), and the reporting that says Trump "must sit for a deposition" (accurate).
— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) February 18, 2022
Key differences.
Plead the fifth you say? https://t.co/df8Z6EGlEe
— Respectful Dialogue (@timeindawater1) February 18, 2022
This should be the preface to the first question. " Mr Trump, do you believe that if you are innocent you should not take the fifth. "
— Watching And Hoping 🚀🌌🪐 (@HopingAnd) February 19, 2022
📺 NEW VIDEO
— MeidasTouch.com (@MeidasTouch) February 18, 2022
By his own admission #TrumpIsGuilty pic.twitter.com/Fdd4qFtjYU
The ONLY reason Daddy takes this call is the crowd.
— Anne McCarthy (@AM_McCarthy) February 18, 2022
On #LSSC tonight: Eminem has a response for Rudy Giuliani 🎤 pic.twitter.com/XAuyCkiSK9
— The Late Show (@colbertlateshow) February 18, 2022
Look
His skull's not hairy
Teeth fake, thrice-ly married
The leakage on his cheekage is scary
Probably sherry
He's drunk
But on the surface he looks, well, drunk
He's not hiding it
Hope he doesn't whip out his junk
Like that one scene
So obscene
He reached for peen
To show a teen
'Til Papa Borat intervened
Rudy: "You think we're stupid? You think we're fools?"
Yeah, but I also think you shouldn't be allowed near schools
He's lost grasp of reality
Whoa, is he having a stroke?
He found ballots, they're faux
He's Trump's madam, that's gross
Befriends Russians, colludes
Love corruption, it's true
He's been pushing the coup
Married his cousin? Oh, ew
The dude should be disbarred
He's a fiend for cigars
He wants treason, it's hard
But he won't stop
Back to the Four Seasons
No, not that Four Seasons
The landscaping business by a dildo shop
You can go screw yourself
You're a doofus, you know it
You bonehead, less-ethical Nosferatu
Told me he's had one shot
It smells more like twenty-two
His cerebellum's gone into rapid decline
Douchenozzle!
Actual news on @FoxNews?! 🤯 https://t.co/vQXAuxrRtE
— Spiro Agnew’s Ghost (@SpiroAgnewGhost) February 18, 2022
— Acyn (@Acyn) February 18, 2022
This is an example of what’s referred to as “ratf*cking”—and it *should* be a federal felony.
— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) February 18, 2022
BREAKING NEWS: Partisan Tactic By Texas Republican Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick’s Campaign Delays Thousands of Requests for Mail-in Ballots From Texas Voters https://t.co/PDjXpKKlqF
NEW: The judge of Harris County, Texas is urging the Department of Justice to intervene after it was revealed that nearly 38% of absentee ballots in the Democratic county have been rejected, largely resulting from the Texas GOP’s new voter suppression law.
— No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen (@NoLieWithBTC) February 19, 2022
Tucker Carlson launches extended sexist rant targeting Rep. Ocasio-Cortezhttps://t.co/L7P1bMggEL
— Media Matters (@mmfa) February 19, 2022
Tucker says AOC is not a woman of color and calls her rich entitled white lady pic.twitter.com/LuFQXfXiZe
— Acyn (@Acyn) February 19, 2022
Tucker says it’s “hilariously absurd” to call AOC a “woman of color,” because she is a “rich, entitled white lady.” pic.twitter.com/uS2fvTuGp8
— Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) February 19, 2022
Remember when the right wing had a meltdown when I suggested they exhibit obsessive impulses around young women?
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) February 19, 2022
Well now Tucker Carlson is wishing for… this on national TV.
You’re a creep bro. If you’re this easy w/ sexual harassment on air, how are you treating your staff? https://t.co/RFbOIRSmxQ
It’s not within the realm of political commentary, & it’s not just me. He regularly targets people that do not have access to resources for protection. Once he gets to fantasizing about “booty calls” of women on national TV I cease to see the political value outside of incitement
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) February 19, 2022
No comments:
Post a Comment