Far-Right Hypocrites Support Supreme Court's Decision Allowing Protestors Free Reign To Harass Patients Outside Health Clinics, But Start Whining And Crying When Protestors Gather Outside Justices' Homes

You don't like protesters at your house? Well I don't like Christians in my uterus.

— Kayla (@RealKaylaJames) May 9, 2022

Weird how there's no protesters outside of my house. Must be because I'm not threatening people with state violence for exercising their bodily autonomy

— Hilary Agro 🍄 (@hilaryagro) May 10, 2022

Where was the worry for the hundreds of election officials when they had ARMED people showing up at their homes? https://t.co/T5awBYuiFY

— Steve (@stelenj) May 10, 2022

But in 2014 he told protesters it was their First Amendment right to approach closer than 35 feet and scream obscenities into his face.

Oh, I guess he thought that would only apply to anti-choice protesters harrasing patients outside of abortion clinics and not his house... pic.twitter.com/UvRkEtunc5

— Hugh G Merriman MD (@merriman_md) May 9, 2022

This photo of a protest near Kavanaugh's house is from September 14, 2021. Was there outrage about that? 🤷🏻♂️https://t.co/Drse9rJhPA

— Ira Goldman 🦆🦆🦆 (@KDbyProxy) May 9, 2022

in the words of justice alito, the constitution makes no reference to not allowing protesters outside your house and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision

— 🦈🌻 shonks for ukraine 🌻🦈 (@seaweedanxiety) May 8, 2022

if kavanaugh doesn’t like the pro abortion protests outside his house, he can simply drive or relocate to a different state. right?

— joshua (@jdgtranen) May 8, 2022

If the protesters at Kavanaugh’s house had brought a noose THEN would Republicans have called it legitimate political discourse.

— The Other 98% (@other98) May 9, 2022

It was wrong for protesters to gather in front of the Kavanaugh house and block deliveries. pic.twitter.com/nSgUxI8VBZ

— 𝕋𝕨𝕠 𝕊𝕙𝕖𝕕𝕤 𝕁𝕒𝕔𝕜𝕤𝕠𝕟 (@HowCamJokes) May 11, 2022

1765 Stamp Act Protesters at the Lt. Governor's house. pic.twitter.com/OK5FcfWg4S

— David Silkenat (@davidsilkenat) May 8, 2022

Democrats Act Like Democrats, Immediately Abandon Their Charade
Of Caring About Women's Rights, Rush To Support Republicans

Senate Dems Won't Protect Abortion Rights, But Vote Unanimously To Protect Justices From Protests
"It's remarkable how quickly the Senate has acted to protect the privacy and safety of five justices," said one critic. "It's something senators are unwilling to do for millions of women."
Julia Conley, Common Dreams, May 10, 2022

Progressives are intensifying calls for the U.S. Congress to pass legislation codifying Roe v. Wade into federal law to counter Republicans' plan to overturn the landmark abortion rights ruling, but on Monday evening Senate Democrats' attention was on a bill aimed at protecting the U.S. Supreme Court justices' family members from protests like those held over the weekend.

There were no reports of violence at pro-choice protests held outside the homes of right-wing Justices Brett Kavanaugh and John Roberts over the weekend, but . . . President Joe Biden  . . . suggest[ed] that the demonstrators, including Kavanaugh's neighbors, who chanted pro-choice slogans and carried signs, had posed a threat to the justices' safety.