Washington's Blog, September 9, 2016
Judges and lawyers know that – if someone intentionally destroys evidence – he’s probably trying to hide his crime. American law has long recognized that destruction of evidence raises a presumption of guilt for the person who destroyed the evidence.The article's subheads:
So what does it mean when the US government intentionally destroyed massive amounts of evidence related to 9/11? ...
Judge and Prosecutor Destroy Evidence
Destruction of Videotapes
Destruction of Air Traffic Control Tapes
Pentagon Fibs
Soviet-Style "Minders"
Undermining Investigation
Censorship
Black Boxes
Saudi Role
Letting Terrorists Go Free
Destruction of Physical Evidence
9/11 Commissioners Disgusted ... and Call For a New Investigation
No comments:
Post a Comment